Skip to main content.

Jan.07.2008

Will the Democratic Congress give telcos, and Bush, immunity?

This issue will be back soon. Sen. Chris Dodd, now no longer a 2008 presidential candidate, will not be able to hold off Harry Reid and the immunity surge very much longer.

This is a great diary today at Daily Kos that explains everything:

Daily Kos: Telecom Immunity Gives Bush Immunity
If the telecoms do not actually need immunity at this time to address issues that presently do not exist, what is Bush's real motive for pushing retroactive immunity now? The answer lies in what may happen to Bush if the telecoms are not provided immunity now: The courts may review evidence showing that Bush acted illegally. Telecom immunity would provide grounds to dismiss the lawsuits to prevent the disclosure of this evidence. However, if the telecom immunity clause only provided immunity to telecoms, then Bush would not be protected from other forums --- like independent media, prosecutors and Congress --- that could investigate his domestic surveillance programs.

Coincidentally, the telecom immunity clause is structured to also provide retroactive immunity to Bush.
Click here for the Maine Owl thread on this topic: http://maineowl.net/blog/category/8/blogid/1

Comments

No comments yet

Add Comment



Note: You may post anonymously, but you cannot leave the name field blank. The other fields are optional. However, if you do enter email and do not give a website, your mailto link will be available to the public. Please register in order to use the member-to-member contact form and avoid needing the "captcha."

Can I use html tags in comments, you may ask? Sorry, no, the comment parser will not render them. However, if you include explicit http links, it will make them hot for you without an a-tag.