Skip to main content.

January 10, 2008

What's the meaning of "violence is down"?

Here's how well the "surge"--the whole bloody occupation, actually--is working:

US launches massive Iraq air raid
BBC - Thursday, 10 January 2008
US bombers and fighter jets have dropped 40,000lb (18,144kg) of bombs on suspected al-Qaeda targets on the edge of Baghdad in a 10-minute air strike.

The attack on the Arab Jabour district, said to be a safe haven for al-Qaeda in Iraq, was part of the wider Operation Phantom Phoenix launched on Tuesday.

Nine US soldiers have been killed since the start of the operation.

It comes as a World Health Organization survey says 151,000 Iraqis have died violently since the 2003 invasion.
Somehow I doubt this neighborhood was some sort of terrorist enclave. Sure, plenty of U.S. enemies there, but that's not the same thing. If they are our enemies, we made them that way.

For a reason why Iraqis might become enemies of the U.S., one needs only absorb the fact of the measure of bombing taken against them. Just think how Americans reacted to 9/11. An equivalent pattern would be for Iraq now to invade New York and declare certain neighborhoods "Zionist safe havens" and then bomb the hell out of them.

The Bush PR strategy has been remarkably effective. I'm sort of amazed. The major effect has been a whole lot of people have stopped caring about what's going on in Iraq. They've heard "violence is down", so everything must be okay. The surge "worked."

Beyond the bogus syllogism that the "surge" has done it, nobody needs to ask WHY violence is down in some areas, or even if it really is down--horrific violence is occurring like the US aerial bombing of neighborhoods as described above, and the under-reported Turkish strikes in N Iraq.

There are answers to why there's an apparent drop: (1) Large swaths have been ethnically cleansed already; (2) The US has bought off and co-opted its enemies in western Iraq--almost signaling a return to
the days of the 80s when the US allied strongly with the chiefs of Saddam's forces--basically the guys who ran the place forever until the US invaded; and (3) The Sadrists have more or less stood down (see 1 above).

This piece tries to explain what a "decrease" in violence in Iraq actually has meant lately, and how the notion is used by the wingnut war crowd.

Comments

"Equivalent pattern" not quite right. Iraq is being attacked by the U.S., even though it never did the same.

Posted by The Owl on January 10, 2008 at 23:40

Wasn’t Arab Jabour safe three weeks ago?
Roads to Iraq

January 10, 2008

As reported today, the US military dropped 18,144kg bombs on a rural area Arab Jabour claiming to be a safe haven for al-Qaeda in Iraq.

You see we will talk about the civilian died but about three weeks ago the same US military claimed that Arab Jabour is safe.

In this Radio Sawa interview - 11-12-2007 - with the commander of the American Third Infantry Division Captain Joseph Inge he said the following:

We cleared the Area Arab Jabour from Al Qaeda threat, with the help of the citizens [Awakening Council]

Added:

We ask all the displaced people to return to their homes, and we will help them

They even released a propaganda video from Arab Jabour

Article nr. 40002 sent on 11-jan-2008 06:49 ECT

http://www.uruknet.info?p=4...

Link: http://www.roadstoiraq.com/...

Posted by The Owl on January 11, 2008 at 23:24
Comments for this item are closed.