Skip to main content.

May.21.2008

Oil price inflation near 100% level, barrel price headed for $200

What does this mean? Click to find out...


Robert Hirsch: stern warning, $12 to $15 gas


A few years ago I used to post more on oil and oil prices. That was a time just after the Iraq invasion when a barrel cost less than $50 and very few people understood or had ever heard of "peak oil."

Despite the recent shocking run-up, few truly understand it today. The misconception is that volume of oil in the ground is the proper measure of oil supply adequacy. Nope. If you hear that there is lots of oil still left in the ground, that is true. But it is the global rate oil is able to be withdrawn for use that has hit a brick ceiling of about 85 million barrels per day, give or take a million, three years running now.

Witness the pathetic groveling of President Bush at the feet of the Saudi dictators last week. It's an interesting story of utter failure (a "snub" in the story at this link), but this time perhaps not the immediate fault of President Bush. In fact, I think Bush may be doing the right thing in the interest of relieving the immediate crisis. Trust me, I'll be pulling for him if his actions relieve some the cost burden. But in the long run, he is pathetic. Oil resources Saudi or otherwise simply cannot be marshaled for limitless increase in production of American gasoline and heating oil.

The Saudis do possibly have some extra capacity, but you have to read the buried lead in this USA Today story to get the real picture, "Saudi leaders said that there was inadequate refining capacity worldwide to process Saudi crude oil, which is heavy and difficult to turn into gas."

So the rub is that while Saudi may have some extra oil, it's not the kind the world wants for making gasoline. The subtext here is that even the Saudis are at full capacity in production of the most desirable crude grades.

Meanwhile, Bush is very tentative in reporting to the American people about the oil situation, aiming his remarks at providing good PR for the Saudis to the U.S. Christian audience Saturday (May 17) in his radio address:
PRESIDENT BUSH: On Friday we visited another of America's friends in the Middle East -- Saudi Arabia. I had a series of productive meetings with King Abdullah at his farm. We celebrated the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the United States and Saudi Arabia. We reaffirmed our shared objectives of peace in the Holy Land, a secure and united Iraq and a sovereign, independent Lebanon that is free of outside interference. We talked about oil production and gasoline prices. We discussed the King's efforts to diversify his nation's economy, and the importance of political reform. And I thanked him for Saudi Arabia's strong commitment to fighting terror.
It's almost as if he thinks we can't handle/don't want to hear the truth about oil depletion. A day later in Egypt, the president had a more provocative message for a gathering of diplomats, where he makes a clear statement that oil "is limited" and will lead to economic trouble:
PRESIDENT BUSH: This is also a time to prepare for the economic changes ahead. Rising price of oil has brought great wealth to some in this region, but the supply of oil is limited, and nations like mine are aggressively developing alternatives to oil. Over time, as the world becomes less dependent on oil, nations in the Middle East will have to build more diverse and more dynamic economies.
Everyone knows that the second Bush term is an incredible disaster. He has no credibility left and faces massive hostility even when he wants to deal in diplomatic reality and operate on a genuine problem-solving basis. His penchant for force and war and the resentment that causes dominates the scene. If Bush's wars are in fact oil wars, they will in the long run achieve exactly the opposite if the strategic goal was to secure the Middle East fields.

Comments

Owl:

The NYTimes had this this morning:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008...

Posted by on May.21.2008 at 15:49

It's so called Environmentalist who have put us in this position of rising energy costs. Any solution has been shot down by propaganda. Check out this article <a href="http://jaajoe.com/index.php...">don't drill for oil and no nuclear power</a>. It's ridiculous what there doing to us.

Posted by on May.21.2008 at 17:15

Oil prices are getting crazy. I can't believe it. I feel really bad for oilheat users. Have you seen the news lately, many are even getting to the point of stealing. We definitely need to do something. Why not concentrate on bioheat. It will help us conserve 400 MILLION gallons of oil. Just imagine, saving 400,000,000 gallons. Prices are to bound to go down after that. But bioheat also helps us go green, by producing NO greenhouse gases and reducing emissions. Check this site I found while working for NORA: http://oilheatamerica.com/i...

It will give you more info about bioheat.

Posted by on May.21.2008 at 17:16

Good link, Gerald. Wished I'd been smart enough to start trading oil in 2004, when people as esteemed as Juan Cole were talking "$30 oil forever."

About "jaajoe": Basically Glen-Beck-style bombastic know nothingness. Watch the video. Hirsch shoots down drilling out of the situation with one sentence. And by the way, I'm certainly not reflexively against oil drilling. We need it done, and in the right places.

I've got one point for Jim: The U.S. uses 400 million gallons of gasoline in ONE DAY. Not saying biofuels should not be explored. It's just that they aren't scalable w/o serious ill effects. Witness the current ethanol/food disaster.

Posted by The Owl on May.21.2008 at 20:36

Add Comment



Note: You may post anonymously, but you cannot leave the name field blank. The other fields are optional. However, if you do enter email and do not give a website, your mailto link will be available to the public. Please register in order to use the member-to-member contact form and avoid needing the "captcha."

Can I use html tags in comments, you may ask? Sorry, no, the comment parser will not render them. However, if you include explicit http links, it will make them hot for you without an a-tag.