US Administration sets limits on how much Central Asian people can yearn in the era of Bush-inspired democratic movements
Via Atrios, I see the Washington Post is reporting today that
Defense officials from Russia and the United States last week helped block a new demand for an international probe into the Uzbekistan government’s shooting of hundreds of protesters last month, according to U.S. and diplomatic officials.
This is an utterly amazing news story. Here is another snip from it:
One official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to discuss the matter, said Rumsfeld caused great surprise by saying — after being told in this discussion that the British language was consistent with stated U.S. policy and should be embraced — that he was unaware of the policy, had not participated in meetings about it and did not want to press for its inclusion in the communique.
The communique nixed by Rumsfeld would have endorsed a “independent, transparent” international investigation into the Andijan massacre carried out by Uzbek forces one month ago. Evidently, the Pentagon has gone to war and prevailed over the State Department over US policy. Terror War basing in Uzbekistan has come out more important than human beings and their political rights.
How Myers kept the aid flowing last year
Here’s yet another good one from the same story:
A senior State Department official, who called The Washington Post at the Defense Department’s request, denied any “split of views.” But other government officials depicted this week’s spat over the communique as a continuation of frictions that erupted last summer, when then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell would not certify that Uzbekistan had met its human rights obligations. The decision led to a cutoff of $18 million for U.S. training for Uzbekistan’s military forces.Weeks later, Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, visited Tashkent, the Uzbek capital, and criticized that decision as “very shortsighted”; he also announced that the United States would give $21 million for another purpose — bioterrorism defense.
Myers and Rumsfeld deserve to be brought up on charges for courting the criminal Karimov regime in contravention of all decency.
HRW lays it out
Meanwhile, a new report on Uzbekistan has been issued by Human Rights Watch. HRW’s report “details the Uzbek government’s indiscriminate use of lethal force against unarmed people, describes government efforts to silence witnesses, and places the events against the background of Uzbekistan’s worsening human rights record.”
PRESIDENT BUSH: “All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.” (January 20, 2005)




He's back
Thursday, June 16th, 2005Reagan-era arms official David Emery emerges as Republican gubernatorial contender in Maine
Emery
An old nemesis is fixing to run for governor of Maine in 2006. David Emery was the opponent of Democrat Tom Andrews in the 1990 race for Maine’s 1st District Congressional seat. It was a political race in which I became deeply involved on Tom’s behalf. Tom won. He became one of the most progressive members ever to represent Maine in the US Congress.
Later, Tom lost to Olympia Snowe in the 1994 race to replace George Mitchell, who retired from the US Senate in 1995. He has had many distinguished positions since, including with the Win Without War coalition in 2003.
Image of button from the 1990 Andrews campaign.
Seeing Emery in public again, slithering out of his hole as a Republican opinion analyst, brings back a flood of memories of the Reagan years. Some of those memories appear in this letter I wrote, that was published in the now-defunct Maine Times (October 19, 1990):
Note the appearance Kenneth Adelman, Emery’s old boss. Adelman, of course, became the Pentagon’s most truculent pre-war promoter of the cakewalk theory of the Iraq occupation.
Posted in commentary | 1 Comment »